Month: September 2021

Episode #67
Today on Categorical Imperatives we have part one of what will be a two part episode About the theoretical origins of Judicial Review. Most people are familiar with Marbury v Madison (1803) Which is widely understood to be the first time the Court articulated a meaning of judicial review in fact, and when talking Marbury, virtually everyone will point to Hamilton’s writing under the pen name Publius in the Federalist Papers, Federalist #78 specifically as the first example of when the doctrine of judicial review was articulated in theory.
Which is all well and good, except that neither of those two things are correct. Judicial review before Marbury is a topic we will get around to discussing at some point in the future, but for today we are going to focus on the first place in the ratification debated we actually find Judicial Review being described which starts with Brutus’ 8th Essay.

Follow & Support
To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we have part one of what will be a two part episode About the theoretical origins of Judicial Review. Most people are familiar with Marbury v Madison (1803) Which is widely understood to be the first time the Court articulated a meaning of judicial review in fact, and when talking Marbury, virtually everyone will point to Hamilton’s writing under the pen name Publius in the Federalist Papers, Federalist #78 specifically as the first example of when the doctrine of judicial review was articulated in theory.
Which is all well and good, except that neither of those two things are correct. Judicial review before Marbury is a topic we will get around to discussing at some point in the future, but for today we are going to focus on the first place in the ratification debated we actually find Judicial Review being described which starts with Brutus’ 8th Essay.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we go back to discuss the case of Roe vs Wade. This is the latest video in my series “Today In Supreme Court History” Where I give a case brief presenting the history, facts and law that are relevant to understand the opinion handed down by the Court.

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) – https://youtu.be/6OB_ehOL6Uc
Whole Women’s Health v Jackson (2021) – https://youtu.be/KKIELHjNBuA

Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request you can e-mail the show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

There have been a lot of misconception and misunderstandings about the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision to deny review for Injunctive relief in Whole Women’s Health v Jackson. I try to tackle some of these misconception and how this case isn’t nearly as big of a deal as people think.
The main take away is that this case was not a decision on the Constitutionality of Texas’ Abortion Law S.B. 8
This case did not overrule Roe
This case does not put Roe in jeopardy of being overruled
Texas’ law is facially unconstitutional and when a Texas citizen brings a Constitutional challenge the Court will strike the case down.
It’s very worrisome that the entire Country thinks this case overruled Roe because it demonstrates a dangerous ignorance over the way the Supreme Court even functions. There was absolutely nothing that they could have done to “block” this law or “Strike down” this law…. That’s not at all how the Court actually functions.
I explain why that is and much much more in this latest episode of Categorical Imperatives.

Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request you can e-mail the show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Episode #63
Today on Categorical Imperatives we go down a rabbit hole about how often police shoot and even kill other officers, why it happens and the disturbing trend I have found that its becoming common to blame a suspect for the death, despite the fact they never contest it was another officer who actually fired the shot that caused the death.
This all sprang from what started as an article of a single, ongoing case where a woman named Jenna Holm is charged with manslaughter after one officer on the scene was hit by a cop car arriving on scene.
These incidents of what I have dubbed “Blue on Blue violence” is something I discovered during my personal research for this video that only seem to be reported on as many separate & distinct instances. I found little data or reporting that has aggregated these instances and looked at them collectively. This episode is a preliminary attempt to compile these sorts of incidents. Since this information is nearly as new to me as it likely is for you. So as I learn more this will be a topic I intend to follow up on in future episodes.

Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request you can e-mail the show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.