Month: November 2021

Today we return to the kyle Rittenhouse case. I discuss why they dropped the misdemeanor gun charge and we assess the incredibly weak closing argument made by Kyle’s attorney Mark Richards. Where did he go wrong and what possible effects might it have on the outcome of the case?

Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

00:00 Introduction
01:30 Misdemeanor Gun Charge
08:15 Closing Argument

Today on Categorical Imperatives we are going to be talking about the Biden Vaccine Mandate in the form of OSHA ETS. The 5th Circuit recently stayed an injunction against the mandate’s implementation until it can be assessed on the merits in the Circuit Court.
We will discuss what the mandate actually purports to do, What the 5th Circuit had to say about the mandate, as well as the reason for their stay until the issue can be properly adjudicated and what comes next in the ultimate plan to get the court to issue a permanent injunction.
We also talk about what the esoteric Circuit Court Lottery is, how it works and what it could mean in this case moving forward.

Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we are talking about updates in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. The way the prosecution’s star witness, appeared more like a star witness for the defense, the way ADA Thomas Binger manages to somehow fuck every day up more than the last and we discuss some of the trial commentary we have been hearing from other YouTube lawyers regarding the outcome of the trial and the quality of the defense. Plus we talk about why it’s time to cancel the FBI

Babylon Bee Article – https://babylonbee.com/news/prosecutors-move-for-mistrial-as-jury-has-been-tainted-by-clear-video-evidence-of-kyle-rittenhouse-defending-himself/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=telegram
Thanks to Blue North Wind for sending me that article!

Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we return to discussing the unfolding trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. In my last video we looked at how the corporate media had beclowned themselves with their ridiculous coverage and analysis of the case.
All this week we have been watching the trial proper, in which the Prosecutor has been laying out his case for conviction…. or at least that’s the idea…. The only problem is that absolutely everything this guy says and does either makes his argument look worse or makes Kyle’s affirmative defense seem much more likely. He couldn’t be doing a better job making sure Kyle walks if he was actually Rittenhouse’s defense even more reasonable.
Really, the prosecution’s case has all the hallmarks of a politically motivated trial of an individual clearly being charged for reasons other than the merits of the case… Because there are none.
I have a few observations to add to what is already a very lively discussion both online and in the real world that is taking place all over the country regarding this trial

Follow & Support

To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/
Substack – https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal

How to support the channel:

Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
All PayPal Donation Options – https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58&currency_code=USD
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

*Correction: In this episode I refer to the legal analyst as “Valarie Jarrett”. Her name is Laura Jarrett. I also say Ms. Jarrett clerked for a Justice, when she clerked for a Circuit Court Judge*
The media and their legal analysts prove once again they are not in the journalism business. They are political activists LARPing as journalists. We discuss what the media got wrong about the pre-trial motions that were heard and considered in Court for the Kyle Rittenhouse trial this last Friday.

The media and their legal analysts prove once again they are not in the journalism business. They are political activists LARPing as journalists. We discuss what the media got wrong about the pre-trial motions that were heard and considered in Court for the Kyle Rittenhouse trial this last Friday.

Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.