Rittenhouse: The Closing
Today we return to the kyle Rittenhouse case. I discuss why they dropped the misdemeanor gun charge and we assess the incredibly weak closing argument made by Kyle’s attorney Mark Richards. Where did he go wrong and what possible effects might it have on the outcome of the case?
Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY – https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee – https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/
Anchor.fm – https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page – https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/
Substack– https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page – https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
Bitchute – https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/
How to support the channel:
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
PayPal.Me – https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
Venmo Donations – http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal
Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com
Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.
00:00 Introduction
01:30 Misdemeanor Gun Charge
08:15 Closing Argument