Netchoice Case Update: Oral Argument Edition

Netchoice Case Update: Oral Argument Edition Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in NetChoice v. Paxton and Moody v. NetChoice, cases challenging Florida and Texas state laws barring major social media firms from using most types of content moderation, thereby requiring them to host content they disapprove of. The oral …

Upcoming Appearance On Freedom Hub Podcast

Greetings Everybody This Thursday November 16th I will be joining Jim Grapek and Charles Frohman for their Freedom Hub Working Group. We will be discussing the Implied Powers Doctrine… …As well as discussing my book “Constitutional Sleight Of Hand – An Explicit History Of Implied Powers” Available on Amazon or through My Shop at …

The Surprising Importance Of Ketanji Brown Jackson

Surprising Importance Of Ketanji Brown Jackson [Original Source: What The Hell Is Progressive Originalism? episode of Legalese Podcast] Should Constitutional Originalists welcome the presence of the Junior Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on the Court? Many people will probably be left shaking their heads as I answer the question with …

Some Updates

Some Updates September 25th, 2023 Hey, greetings everybody. I appreciate your patience as I get this website back to fully functional mode. This has led to a lot of downtime and periods where the website wouldn’t function right. However I now believe I have all the back-end stuff figured that …

Federal Court Smacks Down Civil Asset Forfeiture

Today on Legalese we will be discussing a recent case out of the Sixth Circuit – ‘Ingram v Wayne County’ in which the Court held that when a car is seized under civil asset forfeiture, the owner has a constitutional right to a hearing within two weeks of the seizure.
On top of that encouraging majority opinion, we also discuss the concurring opinion filed in this case by prominent conservative jurist Judge Amul Thapar that takes an even more striking and encouraging position.

First Amendment Beats Police Defendants

Episode #55

Today on Legalese we look at two recent cases that pit private citizens and the First Amendment against qualified immunity and police officers who believe themselves to be above the law.

In Jordan v Adam’s County Sheriff’s Office a man was arrested for criticizing two shitty cops who got very upset when their inflated sense of authority was questioned.

In Bailey v Iles we find a man whose only “crime” was to post a joke on Facebook. Which was considered enough of a crime by the Rapides Parish Police Department in Louisiana to send a SWAT team to arrest him and charge him with violating a state anti-terrorism law.

In both cases the Tenth Circuit and Fifth Circuit Courts of Appeals (respectively) would find in favor of these two citizens while holding the actions of these police to be so unreasonable these officers would not be allowed to cower behind claims of qualified immunity.

Show Notes Page for “First Amendment Beats Police Defendants” –

Verified by MonsterInsights