Episode # 90
Today on Legalese, we discuss the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Culley v. Marshall and how the concurring and dissenting opinions spell the beginning of the end of the immoral and unconstitutional practice of civil asset forfeiture.
• Legalese Home Page – https://www.legalesepodcast.com/
• Sign up for Legalese Newsletter! – https://legaleseshow.com/
Episode # 89
Today on Legalese, we are going to be discussing the case of Hughes v. Few. This was a case recently decided before the Fifth Circuit in an interlocutory appeal, and it constitutes what may very well be the craziest qualified immunity claim any cop has tried to make.
• Legalese Home Page – https://www.legalesepodcast.com/
• Sign up for Legalese Newsletter! – https://legaleseshow.com/
Episode # 87
Today on Legalese we discuss the recent announcement by the Department of Justice that the DEA will be rescheduling marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act from Schedule I to Schedule III.
We discuss why this move is entirely worthless in that it accomplishes none of the goals the Biden Administration say they are passing it to accomplish. We also explore why such moves are meaningless by intent.
Because all of these arguments and debates take place within an acceptable window of dissent to avoid ever having a conversation about the fact that it is immoral for the government to dictate which substances a person is permitted to consume, whether it is alcohol, tobacco, herbal remedies, saturated fat, marijuana, etc. These decisions belong to individual people, not the government.
Show Notes Page For This Episode – https://constitutionallaw.substack.com/p/show-notes-why-rescheduling-marijuana
• Legalese Home Page – https://www.legalesepodcast.com/
• Sign up for Legalese Newsletter! – https://legaleseshow.com/
