Netchoice Case Update: Oral Argument Edition Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in NetChoice v. Paxton and Moody v. NetChoice, cases challenging Florida and Texas state laws barring major social media firms from using most types of content moderation, thereby requiring them to host content they disapprove of. The oral …
Moore Money, Moore Problems Oral argument suggests narrow ruling to uphold disputed tax Moore v United States, a potential landmark Sixteenth Amendment case was argued before the court on December 5 2023. This is a case about the constitutional limits on Congress’s power to tax. I realize reading a summary …
Surprising Importance Of Ketanji Brown Jackson [Original Source: What The Hell Is Progressive Originalism? episode of Legalese Podcast] Should Constitutional Originalists welcome the presence of the Junior Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on the Court? Many people will probably be left shaking their heads as I answer the question with …
Looking for your feedback on some future potential live stream events as part of my Supreme Court Roundup
Episode #58
Today I will be discussing the cases that I will be covering in depth during the coming Supreme Court term for 2023-2024
Sedition: An American Virtue Originally Published On Substack July 30th, 2021 There is a word that has become increasingly popular ever since Trump was elected in 2016. Sedition. And since the January 6th storming of the Capitol sedition seems to be a word dripping from everyone’s lips. To give some …
Episode #52
Today on Legalese we will be discussing the Supreme Court’s landmark equal protection clause case dealing with the constitutionality of racially biased admissions discrimination policies on both public and private universities.
The case: Students For Fair Admission v Harvard effectively puts an end to affirmative action in college admissions in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in it’s opinion that the affirmative action policies fail the strict scrutiny standard in every regard.
Follow & Support
Subscribe To Legalese Newsletter – https://legaleseshow.com/
Legalese Homepage – https://www.legalesepodcast.com/
Contact Me – Bob@legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.
Today on Legalese is the first of two videos covering the Trial of Muhammad Ali
In this part we focus of the history of Conscientious objection in the United States, get a general overview of the events that unfolded over a period of several years as Muhammad Ali fought what could be seen as his toughest fight ever. Fighting for his right not to go and fight in a war based on his religious convictions. We also discuss some parallels between the Vietnam War and the present war in Ukraine.
Today on Legalese we are going to be examining the case of Brunson v Adams (Also commonly referred to at Docket 22-380). Raland Brunson is suing 388 members of Congress, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris & Mike Pence seeking to kick them out of office then declare them traitors by judicial fiat and put Trump back in office immediately because he believes the election was stolen.
This case is fascinating for many reason and I want to share those reasons.
Whether you support this case, vehemently oppose it, or have simply never heard of it. Every one has something to gain from listening.
For those who would like an outline of the important facts and relevant details of the Bruen case in a simple reference guide, I have drawn up just such a guide for your convenience.
