To Keep and Bear Arms 2: Militia Boogaloo (Sometimes a duty, Ever a Right Part Two)
To Keep and Bear Arms 2: Militia Boogaloo (Sometimes a duty, Ever a Right Part Two)

To Keep and Bear Arms 2: Militia Boogaloo (Sometimes a duty, Ever a Right Part Two)

Views: 48
Read Time:2 Minute

On this episode of Categorical Imperatives We discuss the Second Amendment and the General Militia Power as a form of Police Reform. That may sounds counter-intuitive, Prima Facie, but I will be making the case as to why this is a crucial step to take, following the death of George Floyd.

This is the second episode exploring the 2nd amendment and a re-discovery of the true meaning of the general militia as defined both in history and law. From English Common Law to our current Corpus Juris.

To Watch Part One of the Series: https://youtu.be/HVjlqgAV5ig

Collection of Tenth Amendment Center Articles and Videos on numerous topics related to police reform:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NjbXOax5B30hgiKtiCQvQdNUjL_zzZc

Case Law and Case Briefs

Dred Scott v Sanford
http://sites.gsu.edu/us-constipedia/378-2/
https://legaldictionary.net/dred-scott-v-sandford/
https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/dredscott.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/60/393

Civil Rights Act of 1866
https://www.fjc.gov/history/timeline/civil-rights-act-1866

Freedman’s Butreau Bill
https://www.cop.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/FreedmensBureau.htm

Slaughterhouse Cases
http://sites.gsu.edu/us-constipedia/slaughterhouse-cases/

U.S. V CRUIKSHANK
http://sites.gsu.edu/us-constipedia/u-s-v-cruikshank/
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/92/542/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/92/542

Militia Acts of 1792 and 1903
https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/militia_act_of_1903
https://archive.org/stream/jstor-25119439/25119439_djvu.txt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Acts_of_1792

Barron v Baltimore
https://cases.laws.com/barron-v-baltimore

Salinas v Blakely
https://guncite.com/court/state/83p619.html

United States v Miller
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/

United States v Emerson
http://www.ecases.us/case/ca5/c34012/united-states-v-emerson

DC v Heller
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dc-v-heller/

McDonald v Chicago
https://www.britannica.com/event/McDonald-v-City-of-Chicago
https://legaldictionary.net/mcdonald-v-chicago/
http://sites.gsu.edu/us-constipedia/chicago-v-mcdonald-2010/

Matter of Babington v. Yellow Taxi Corp., 164 N.E. 726 (NY 1928)
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3601389/matter-of-babington-v-yellow-taxi-corp/

THE FOUNDERS CONSTITUTION (EXCERPTS)
Chapter 3 Document 3 “Right of Revolution”
William Blackstone
https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch3s3.html

CHAPTER 3 | Document 4
Samuel Adams, Boston Gazette
27 Feb. 1769 Writings 1:316–19
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch3s4.html

CHAPTER 16 | Document 23
James Madison, Property
29 Mar. 1792 Papers 14:266–68
https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s23.html

►00:00 Introduction & Overview Of Part One
►03:15 District of Colombia v Heller
►06:51 Preamble to the Bill of Rights
►09:25 Majority and Minority Opinion for Heller
►09:35 Collective/Individual Right?
►14:20 Original Meaning and Original Intent Jurisprudence
►15:30 McDonald v Heller
►21:10 Original Meaning or Substantive Due Process?
►25:15 Conclusions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights